Can we understand others without ‘seeing’ their experience? Try painting an image you can’t see! This is an experiential learning exercise that helps participants become aware of our biased and limited awareness as researchers.
Kirsten Williams
Gioel Gioacchino and Ani Hao
-
Researchers observe reality and abstract it. This is a really hard (and sometimes dangerous) task. This exercise is a great metaphor of the research process. Working in pairs, one participant is asked to describe a painting to the other partner. Just like a researcher tries to make sense of the reality of another person, the partner is tasked to re-paint an image they can’t see. This exercise sometimes can be very frustrating, but it is a powerful reminder that as researchers we need to be aware of our limits and our bias.
Stepping into a community, there is so much that we don’t see. If a painting is so hard to describe, imagine describing a personal experience of another person! We need to be humble, listen carefully, and communicate effectively.
At the Recrear House-Office we organize lots of ‘painting nights’: we hang out with our friends and paint together. Afterwards, we recycle the painting for different exercises. We adapted this exercise based on a workshop that Cuso International utilizes to train their international volunteers to be conscious of their limited perceptions of a community when working in different country.
Allows participants to explore their positions in communities and what kinds of invisible factors create barriers or facilitate opportunities for learning.
If the pairs are researchers from different communities/nationalities, there might be communication challenges. They may face difficulties in finding the right words to express themselves, or use references that are not as relevant for the other person. These obstacles are all part of the important lessons we need to take with us when stepping into community. Allow participants to experience those challenges and reflect on them later.
During the final debrief, think about addressing power dynamics and experiential gaps between researchers and co-researchers (such as gender, class, race, sexuality, nationality and disability).